EHCP Genie

What could Individual Support Plans mean for schools and local authorities?

Individual Support Plans (ISPs) could change how schools and local authorities deliver and oversee SEND support. As preparation begins, the practical questions are coming into focus: how reviews would work, how support stays consistent across settings, and how to keep visibility across larger cohorts without adding workload.

SEND Oversight Diagram
SEND
Oversight
School
Local
Authority
SENDCO
Review
Support
Plan
Provision

The SEND reform conversation is quickly becoming operational

Much of the ISP debate has focused on policy. For the schools and local authorities who would deliver it, implementation matters just as much. The question is no longer whether change is coming, but how support can realistically be coordinated, reviewed and monitored in systems already under pressure.

An illustration of a person working at a desk on a laptop, with files piling up beside her.

Questions emerging across the sector

How would schools manage additional review and coordination activity?

How could support remain consistent across settings and organisations?

How might schools and local authorities maintain visibility across larger cohorts?

How do we avoid creating additional administration, duplication and fragmentation?

EHCP Pathway Diagram
Child /
Young Person
EHCP established
pathway
ISP proposed
pathway
Review & Visibility coordinated oversight
across all settings
Operational
Oversight

What are Individual Support Plans (ISPs)?

Current SEND reform proposals suggest that Individual Support Plans could become a common layer of SEND support across more children and young people.

Children with an EHCP would also have an ISP, while others may have an ISP without an EHCP. Much about how this would work in practice is still unconfirmed: who oversees ISPs, how reviews run, and how consistency is held across settings.

That uncertainty is exactly why schools and local authorities are focusing on operational readiness now, ahead of any final decisions.

The operational challenge may become as important as the policy challenge

Because ISPs would sit across a much wider group than EHCPs do today, and children with an EHCP would hold both, the number of plans to write, review and keep visible could rise sharply rather than simply shift from one process to another.

Most schools and local authorities are already managing demand, workforce pressure, review backlogs and disconnected systems.

The real concern is less about the policy than about delivering it at that scale sustainably: holding visibility, consistency and oversight without adding duplication or admin.

That is why attention is turning to the operational infrastructure beneath SEND, and how review activity, oversight and support planning could work more consistently across settings.

Feature Grid
Visibility
Consistency
Oversight
Collaboration
Reviews
Operational
pressure

How schools and local authorities are beginning to prepare

One theme is common to both: this will need connected operational approaches, not disconnected administrative processes.

Schools and Trusts

Operational readiness
Schools and trusts are thinking about how to review support plans consistently across settings, manage SENDCO workload sustainably, and track interventions and provision without adding fragmentation.

•  Consistent review management across settings
•  Sustainable SENDCO workload planning
•  Tracking interventions and provision
•  Reducing administrative duplication

Local Authorities

Strategic oversight
Local authorities are exploring how visibility, oversight and consistency could work at scale if larger numbers of plans sit outside the EHCP process, and how to collaborate and share workflows with schools.

•  Oversight at scale across larger cohorts
•  Visibility beyond traditional EHCP processes
•  Shared workflows with schools and trusts
•  Operational transparency and reporting

The role of technology and AI in SEND workflows

AI and digital workflows are part of this too, though the sector’s interest is cautious and pragmatic.

The strongest appetite is for assistive tools that improve visibility, strengthen consistency, reduce admin and support collaboration, rather than anything that replaces professional judgement.

Many organisations are looking at how digital systems could help manage reviews, improve oversight and reduce fragmentation as demand grows.

An illustration of a person working at a desk on a laptop, with files piling up beside her.

SHAPE NATIONAL SOLUTIONS

Your perspective can shape how ISPs work nationally

Imosphere works with local authorities across England on SEND oversight and reviews. As ISPs take shape, we’re speaking with schools, trusts and local authorities to map the practical questions emerging around reform, so the solutions we build reflect what the sector actually needs.

If your organisation is already navigating ISPs or anticipating the pressures ahead, we’d value hearing your experience.

Join the conversation

STAY INFORMED

Be the first to hear as ISP solutions develop

We’ll share updates on ISP policy, operational guidance and the tools we’re building for schools and local authorities as they become available.

Frequently asked questions about ISPs

What are Individual Support Plans (ISPs)?

Individual Support Plans are part of the proposed SEND reform discussions and may provide support pathways for some children and young people who may previously have received an EHCP.

Could ISPs replace EHCPs?

Current proposals suggest ISPs may sit alongside existing support structures, although many operational and policy details remain uncertain.

How could ISPs affect schools operationally?

Schools may need to manage increased review activity, coordination and visibility across support plans, interventions and provision. Many organisations are already beginning to explore what sustainable operational delivery may require in practice.

Why are schools and local authorities discussing visibility and oversight?

If support plans scale across larger cohorts, maintaining consistency and operational visibility may become increasingly challenging using fragmented or manual workflows.

How could schools review and manage ISPs consistently?

Many schools are beginning to explore how support plans, interventions and review activity could be managed through more connected workflows that reduce duplication and improve visibility across pupils and cohorts.

What operational challenges could local authorities face if ISPs scale?

Local authorities may need clearer visibility across support activity, review processes, patterns of need and collaboration between settings. Questions around oversight, consistency and operational transparency are already emerging across the sector.

Could technology support ISP workflows and reviews?

Many organisations are exploring how digital workflows and assistive AI approaches could help reduce administrative burden, improve oversight and support more connected SEND processes - particularly around reviews, visibility and collaboration.

How are local authorities preparing for potential ISP implementation?

Many councils are already beginning to think about operational readiness, including how systems, workflows and oversight models may need to evolve alongside SEND reform.

Why are connected SEND workflows becoming more important?

As SEND processes become more complex, many organisations are looking at how connected workflows could help improve consistency, reduce fragmentation and strengthen operational visibility across services.

How is Imosphere supporting SEND operational workflows?

Imosphere works with local authorities across England to support clearer, more connected SEND workflows focused on consistency, visibility and operational oversight across SEND services.